Claim: Scientific Dating Appears to Confirm that Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem is Indeed Jesus’ Tomb

A shrine called the Edicule in Jerusalem's Church of the Holy Sepulchre is believed by some to be the site of Jesus' tomb. (File photo by Gary D. Myers)

A shrine called the Edicule in Jerusalem’s Church of the Holy Sepulchre is believed by some to be the site of Jesus’ tomb. (File photo by Gary D. Myers)

Scientific dating of ancient mortar in Jerusalem has added to what some scholars call mounting evidence the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was the site of Jesus’ tomb.

“Obviously our faith does not rest in external evidences,” said Daniel Warner, associate professor of Old Testament and archaeology at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, noting the Bible alone is humans’ infallible rule for faith and practice. But “it’s nice and comforting to know that what we’ve been claiming since the [time] of Christ … has always panned out.”

In October 2016, scientists opened the shrine surrounding Jesus’ purported burial site in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre for the first time in centuries. Among their discoveries was an ancient limestone tomb surrounded by a marble slab.

Independent analyses by two labs released Nov. 28 by National Geographic confirmed that mortar between the slab and the tomb dates to around A.D. 345, approximately the same time Roman records indicate the tomb was enshrined to mark it as Christ’s burial site.

Warner told Baptist Press Christians living some 300 years after the resurrection likely would have had accurate records of significant sites in Jesus’ life — much like accurate records of sites in George Washington’s life still exist today nearly three centuries following his birth.

“As important as Washington was, think about what Christ did,” Warner said. “A guy who never went more than 50 miles from His house changed the course of the world … They knew what the site [of His burial] was” in the fourth century.

Warner noted the site of Jesus’ tomb cannot be pinpointed with certainty, but he said the “circumstantial” evidence is strong for the Church of the Holy Sepulchre as opposed to the so-called Garden Tomb, an alternate proposed site of Christ’s burial.

Click here to continue reading…

SOURCE: David Roach
Baptist Press

Share