Here We Go: Minnesota Courts Says Christian Filmmakers Must Work Homosexual Weddings
A Minnesota court has ruled that a Christian filmmaking couple must document gay weddings despite their religious beliefs that marriage is only between a man and a woman.
Alliance Defending Freedom, the law firm representing Carl and Angel Larsen of Telescope Media Group, announced on Wednesday that it will appeal against Chief U.S. District Judge John Tunheim’s decision.
“Tolerance is a two-way street. Creative professionals who engage in the expression of ideas shouldn’t be threatened with fines and jail simply for having a particular point of view about marriage that the government may not favor,” said ADF Senior Counsel Jeremy Tedesco following the decision.
“Public officials can’t censor filmmakers or demand that they tell stories in film that violate their deepest convictions.”
Tedesco insisted that people should have the freedom to disagree on critical matters of conscience.
“The same government that can force them to violate their faith and conscience can force any one of us to do the same. That’s why we plan to appeal this ruling to the 8th Circuit,” he added.
The Larsens, who have been married for 15 years, say that they use their talents to “magnify Christ like a telescope.”
Their Telescope Media company documents marriages and provides other services to Christian organizations, but Minnesota law requires them to also work gay weddings if requested.
ADF explained that the case, Telescope Media Group v. Lindsey, challenges portions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363, which states that professionals must promote objectionable messages, even if they disagree with them.
Tunheim said in his ruling that the couple’s policy on which marriages they can not film stands against the First Amendment, however.
“Posting language on a website telling potential customers that a business will discriminate based on sexual orientation is part of the act of sexual orientation discrimination itself,” the judge wrote. “As conduct carried out through language, this act is not protected by the First Amendment.”
Click here to read more.
Source: Christian Post